Exercise #15  Reducing Fractions by Zoran Horvat @zoranh75 December 12, 2013
Problem Statement
Given two integers n >= 0 and m > 0, write a function which reduces fraction n/m by producing a pair of relatively prime numbers p and q such that n/m=p/q.
Example: Suppose that initial fraction is 247/26. Reduced fraction is 19/2.
Problem Analysis
To reduce a fraction, we need to find a number which divides without remainder
both the numerator and the denominator. Larger the divisor, smaller the
numerator and the denominator will be after being divided by it. The largest
divisor for two numbers is called greatest common divisor (or greatest common
factor). When two numbers are divided by their GCD, they become relatively
prime. This means that there is no common factor for the two numbers anymore.
So the problem of reducing a fraction is to calculate greatest common divisor
of its numerator and denominator k, such that n=pk and m=qk. After dividing both numbers in fraction n/m with k, we obtain the reduced fraction p/q.
Now we will focus on the problem of calculating GCD for two integer numbers n and m. First of all, notice that GCD(n, m) is the same as GCD(m, n). Consequently, we are free to assume that n >= m (if it is not, then we can simply swap the values). Next, we will assume that
there is some value k >= 1 such that it divides both n and m: n=pk, m=qk. Finally, we will notice that if k divides n and m, then k also divides their difference nm. This is proven easily:
We can follow the same logic and claim that k also divides n2m, n3m, ..., nam. This process ends with value a such that nam becomes smaller than m. In other words, nam is the remainder after dividing n by m:
By combing this equation with relations to GCD we can prove what we have
already predicted: that remainder when dividing n by m shares the same GCD with original numbers n and m:
Since n mod m is less than both n and m, it seems that we have transformed the original problem into a smaller one
which yields the same result. We are free to repeat the step and to produce
another pair of even smaller numbers. The question is when does this process
end? Well, at some point the modulo will eventually have to become zero. At
that point we will observe that GCD(x, 0) = x for any positive integer x. This gives us the ending criterion: the process of replacing the lower
argument to GCD with modulo result ends when modulo becomes zero. At that
moment the other argument, which is still positive, becomes the overall result,
i.e. it is the requested GCD(n, m).
Here is the simple recursive solution to the problem:
int gcdRecursive(n, m)
{
if (n < m)
return gcdRecursive(m, n);
if (m == 0)
return n;
return gcdRecursive(m, n % m);
}
The first if statement ensures that first argument is greater or equal to the
second argument, which is prerequisite to calculate the first modulo. Second if
statement tests the ending criterion: if smaller argument has reached zero,
then the first argument is overall result. Finally, if both arguments are
positive, with first argument being greater or equal to the second argument,
then we repeat the calculation on modified arguments: smaller number becomes
the first argument, and result of modulo operation becomes the second argument.
Function presented above is quite handy, but needlessly complicated in terms of
recursive calls. It can be easily transformed into iterative form:
int gcd(n, m)
{
if (n < m)
{
int tmp = n;
n = m;
m = tmp;
}
while (m > 0)
{
int tmp = n % m;
n = m;
m = tmp;
}
return n;
}
This implementation produces the same output as the recursive one. This
function can then be used to reduce the fraction:
void reduceFraction(n in/out, m in/out)
{
int k = gcd(n, m);
n /= k;
m /= k;
}
Implementation
Below is the complete implementation of console application in C# which inputs
fractions, reduces them and prints them out reduced.
using System;
namespace ReducingFractions
{
public class Program
{
static int Gcd(int n, int m)
{
if (n < m)
{
int tmp = n;
n = m;
m = tmp;
}
while (m > 0)
{
int tmp = n % m;
n = m;
m = tmp;
}
return n;
}
static void ReduceFraction(ref int n, ref int m)
{
int k = Gcd(n, m);
n = k;
m = k;
}
static void Main(string[] args)
{
while (true)
{
Console.Write("Enter numerator (negative to exit): ");
int n = int.Parse(Console.ReadLine());
if (n < 0)
break;
Console.Write("Enter denominator: ");
int m = int.Parse(Console.ReadLine());
int p = n;
int q = m;
ReduceFraction(ref p, ref q);
Console.WriteLine("{0} / {1} = {2} / {3}", n, m, p, q);
Console.WriteLine();
}
}
}
}
Demonstration
When application is run, it produces output like this:
Enter numerator (negative to exit): 12
Enter denominator: 16
12 / 16 = 3 / 4
Enter numerator (negative to exit): 3
Enter denominator: 5
3 / 5 = 3 / 5
Enter numerator (negative to exit): 247
Enter denominator: 26
247 / 26 = 19 / 2
Enter numerator (negative to exit): 0
Enter denominator: 9
0 / 9 = 0 / 1
Enter numerator (negative to exit): 1
See also:
Published: Dec 12, 2013
ZORAN HORVAT Zoran is software architect dedicated to clean design and CTO in a growing software company. Since 2014 Zoran is an author at Pluralsight where he is preparing a series of courses on objectoriented and functional design, design patterns, writing unit and integration tests and applying methods to improve code design and longterm maintainability. Follow him on Twitter @zoranh75 to receive updates and links to new articles. Watch Zoran's video courses at pluralsight.com (requires registration): Making Your C# Code More ObjectOriented This course will help leverage your conceptual understanding to produce proper objectoriented code, where objects will completely replace procedural code for the sake of flexibility and maintainability. More... Advanced Defensive Programming Techniques This course will lead you step by step through the process of developing defensive design practices, which can substitute common defensive coding, for the better of software design and implementation. More... Tactical Design Patterns in .NET: Creating Objects This course sheds light on issues that arise when implementing creational design patterns and then provides practical solutions that will make our code easier to write and more stable when running. More... Tactical Design Patterns in .NET: Managing Responsibilities Applying a design pattern to a realworld problem is not as straightforward as literature implicitly tells us. It is a more engaged process. This course gives an insight to tactical decisions we need to make when applying design patterns that have to do with separating and implementing class responsibilities. More... Tactical Design Patterns in .NET: Control Flow Improve your skills in writing simpler and safer code by applying coding practices and design patterns that are affecting control flow. More... Writing Highly Maintainable Unit Tests This course will teach you how to develop maintainable and sustainable tests as your production code grows and develops. More... Improving Testability Through Design This course tackles the issues of designing a complex application so that it can be covered with high quality tests. More... Share this article
